Power domain fits much better than a voltage regulator in regards to a proper hardware description and from a software perspective as well. Hence replace the core regulator with the power domain. Note that this doesn't affect any existing DTBs because we haven't started to use the regulator yet, and thus, it's okay to change it. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> --- .../bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt index cc443fcf4bec..143439b50c92 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra20-emc.txt @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ For each opp entry in 'operating-points-v2' table: matches, the OPP gets enabled. Optional properties: -- core-supply: Phandle of voltage regulator of the SoC "core" power domain. +- power-domains: Phandle to the SoC "core" power domain. Child device nodes describe the memory settings for different configurations and clock rates. @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ Example: interrupts = <0 78 0x04>; clocks = <&tegra_car TEGRA20_CLK_EMC>; nvidia,memory-controller = <&mc>; - core-supply = <&core_vdd_reg>; + power-domains = <&domain>; operating-points-v2 = <&opp_table>; } -- 2.29.2
