On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:48:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 12:18:39PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > ... > > > > + phy-handle = <&phy0>; > > > > + mac-address = [000000000000]; /* will be set by U-Boot */ > > > > > > Shouldn't it be local-mac-address? > > > > > probably yes, but both 'mac-address' and 'local-mac-address' are being > > set up by U-Boot anyway. > > Okay, never mind. I just realized kernel supports both properties. > > ... > > > > > +&esdhc1 { > > > > + cd-gpios = <&gpio3 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > > > > + fsl,wp-controller; > > > > > > Does it work for you, since the driver does not support it as of today? > > > > > What driver doesn't support what? > > AFAICT the sdhci-esdhc-imx.c driver supports both of these properties. > > That was the case before, but it's not the case since commit > 89d7e5c13122 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add runtime pm support). > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/27287 > > ... > > > > > + spidev0: spi@0 { > > > > + compatible = "spidev"; > > > > + reg = <0>; > > > > + spi-max-frequency = <54000000>; > > > > + }; > > > > + > > > > + spidev1: spi@1 { > > > > + compatible = "spidev"; > > > > + reg = <1>; > > > > + spi-max-frequency = <54000000>; > > > > + }; > > > > > > I'm not sure we should have these two devices. > > > > > Why not? With this the SPI bus can readily be used with the spidev > > driver from Documentation/spi/spidev_test.c (which is what most of our > > customers are asking for)! > > Is this something that has been approved by DT maintainers? I do not > see "spidev" documented as a compatible in any bindings doc. I don't think it has been approved, but it's used already in several places: arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1340-evb.dts:496: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/spear1310-evb.dts:402: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts:623: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/imx28-tx28.dts:629: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/atlas6-evb.dts:32: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/marco-evb.dts:41: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts:78: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-tx53.dtsi:173: compatible = "spidev"; arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-tx53.dtsi:179: compatible = "spidev"; arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mgcoge.dts:235: compatible = "gen,spidev"; arch/powerpc/boot/dts/o2d.dtsi:43: compatible = "spidev"; arch/powerpc/boot/dts/digsy_mtc.dts:34: compatible = "spidev"; Usually this binding gets denied with "spidev is Linux specific. Use a specific compatible instead". This had the result that the spidev driver now matches to "rohm,dh2228fv" and I have already seen people claiming that their spi device is a "rohm,dh2228fv" just to let the spidev driver match. Maybe the reasoning for a spidev binding could be: There is a SPI device, but we don't know what it is, so we just call it "spidev". Linux just tries to make the best from the situation and makes a userspace device from it. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html