On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 13:42 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>
> On 19/11/2020 15:13, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> > Hi Weiyi,
> >
> > Missatge de Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> del dia dj., 19 de nov.
> > 2020 a les 14:10:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 13:13 +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> >>> Hi Weiyi,
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the patch
> >>>
> >>> Missatge de Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> del dia dj., 19 de nov.
> >>> 2020 a les 11:48:
> >>>>
> >>>> Add power domains controller node for SoC mt8192
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> [...]
> >>>> + /* System Power Manager */
> >>>> + spm: power-controller {
> >>>> + compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-power-controller";
> >>>> + #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>> + #size-cells = <0>;
> >>>> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + /* power domain of the SoC */
> >>>> + audio@MT8192_POWER_DOMAIN_AUDIO {
> >>>
> >>> If you run the dt_bindings_check it should return some errors, as all
> >>> these node names should be 'power-domain@'. Which is a bit annoying
> >>> because then you will get a bunch of errors like this:
> >>>
> >>> [ 1.969110] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 1.976997] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 1.984828] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 1.992657] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.000685] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.008566] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.016395] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.024221] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.032049] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.039874] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.047699] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.055524] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.063352] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>> [ 2.071176] debugfs: Directory 'power-domain' with parent
> >>> 'pm_genpd' already present!
> >>>
> >>> But that's another problem that should be handled in debugfs system.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Indeed...so I chose to use different name in dts to avoid problems in
> >> debugfs. It does violate the naming rules.
> >>
> >
> > But your binding will not pass (or trigger warnings) the dtb check
> > then. Rob was clear that names should be generic. Proper fix is fix
> > debugfs not the binding.
> >
>
> By the way, is anybody working on this debugfs issue?
>
I think we can solve this problem by adding "name" to the struct
scpsys_domain_data and use this domain_data->name as the genpd.name.
This is very simple. But I want to know if you both like it?
> Regards,
> Matthias
