On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 06:14:27PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On 24/06/2014 14:56, Jason Cooper wrote: ... > > Once you post the new series, I assume it's ok to apply patches 1-3 to > > irqchip/core, or are there some dependency considerations? > > Patches 6 and 7 depend on the 3 first patches, but we should be able to > merge them through the at91/arm-soc tree (Nicolas might have to rebase > its tree for 3.17 on irqchip/core after you have applied patches 1-3). I'll create a topic branch for you when the time comes. That way arm-soc doesn't have to pull in any code it doesn't actually need (helps with for-next testing). Please give me a gentle reminder in the coverletter or comments when you send the next version. > Anyway, I'd like to wait for at91 maintainers/developers reviews before > posting a new version. Sure. thx, Jason. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
