> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 02:47:42PM +0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 01:14:50PM +0100, Adam Ward wrote: > Actually, perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't quite see why this > move to a sub-node is needed. There is some flexibility in the > regulator framework for this as I noted earlier > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201102154848.tm5nsydaukyd7rrw@xxxxxxxx/). > For the case of an MFD it certainly makes sense to have a "regulators" > sub-node but for these chips it seems rather redundant. This sub-node looks fairly well instituted for devices with multiple regulators. There's also the possibility to add GPIO support into another sub-node for all the variants. Mark, do you have a preference?
