On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 08:42:10PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > 13.11.2020 20:28, Mark Brown пишет: > >> What should we do? > > As I keep saying the consumer driver should be enumerating the voltages > > it can set, if it can't find any and wants to continue then it can just > > skip setting voltages later on. If only some are unavailable then it > > probably wants to eliminate those specific OPPs instead. > I'm seeing a dummy regulator as a helper for consumer drivers which > removes burden of handling an absent (optional) regulator. Is this a > correct understanding of a dummy regulator? > Older DTBs don't have a regulator and we want to keep them working. This > is equal to a physically absent regulator and in this case it's an > optional regulator, IMO. No, you are failing to understand the purpose of this code. To reiterate unless the device supports operating with the supply physically absent then the driver should not be attempting to use regulator_get_optional(). That exists specifically for the case where the supply may be absent, nothing else. The dummy regulator is there precisely for the case where the system does not describe supplies that we know are required for the device to function, it fixes up that omission so we don't need to open code handling of this in every single consumer driver. Regulators that are present but not described by the firmware are a clearly different case to regulators that are not physically there, hardware with actually optional regulators will generally require some configuration for this case.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
