On Friday, 13 November 2020, 00:07:32 CET, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:35:31PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote: > > The devices have an optional interrupt line. > > > > Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml | 8 ++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml index > > 431ca5c498a8..b2613d6c97cf 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml > > ... > > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio5>; > > + interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* INTRP_N line */ > > Isn't it preferable to use this syntax? > > interrupts-extended = <&gpio5 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* INTRP_N line */ After reading Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt, I would say that "interrupts-extended" is more flexible as it allows different interrupt parents for the case there is more than one interrupt line. Although there is only one line on the KSZ, I will change this.
