On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:35:31PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> The devices have an optional interrupt line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
> index 431ca5c498a8..b2613d6c97cf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/microchip,ksz.yaml
> @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ properties:
> Should be a gpio specifier for a reset line.
> maxItems: 1
>
> + interrupts:
> + description:
> + Interrupt specifier for the INTRP_N line from the device.
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> microchip,synclko-125:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/flag
> description:
> @@ -47,6 +52,7 @@ required:
> examples:
> - |
> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>
> // Ethernet switch connected via SPI to the host, CPU port wired to eth0:
> eth0 {
> @@ -68,6 +74,8 @@ examples:
> compatible = "microchip,ksz9477";
> reg = <0>;
> reset-gpios = <&gpio5 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio5>;
> + interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* INTRP_N line */
Isn't it preferable to use this syntax?
interrupts-extended = <&gpio5 1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>; /* INTRP_N line */
