On Mon, Nov 09, 2020 at 07:31:11PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Provide a default compatible string which is based on the 58522 SRAB
> compatible, this allows us to have sane defaults and silences the
> following warnings:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958522er.dt.yaml:
> ethernet-switch@36000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed,
> one
> must be fixed:
> ['brcm,bcm5301x-srab'] is too short
> 'brcm,bcm5325' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm53115' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm53125' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm53128' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm5365' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm5395' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm5389' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm5397' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm5398' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm11360-srab' was expected
> 'brcm,bcm5301x-srab' is not one of ['brcm,bcm53010-srab',
> 'brcm,bcm53011-srab', 'brcm,bcm53012-srab', 'brcm,bcm53018-srab',
> 'brcm,bcm53019-srab']
> 'brcm,bcm5301x-srab' is not one of ['brcm,bcm11404-srab',
> 'brcm,bcm11407-srab', 'brcm,bcm11409-srab', 'brcm,bcm58310-srab',
> 'brcm,bcm58311-srab', 'brcm,bcm58313-srab']
> 'brcm,bcm5301x-srab' is not one of ['brcm,bcm58522-srab',
> 'brcm,bcm58523-srab', 'brcm,bcm58525-srab', 'brcm,bcm58622-srab',
> 'brcm,bcm58623-srab', 'brcm,bcm58625-srab', 'brcm,bcm88312-srab']
> 'brcm,bcm5301x-srab' is not one of ['brcm,bcm3384-switch',
> 'brcm,bcm6328-switch', 'brcm,bcm6368-switch']
> From schema:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/b53.yaml
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> index 09fd7e55c069..8453865d1439 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ ccbtimer1: timer@35000 {
> };
>
> srab: ethernet-switch@36000 {
> - compatible = "brcm,nsp-srab";
> + compatible = "brcm,bcm58522-srab", "brcm,nsp-srab";
> reg = <0x36000 0x1000>,
> <0x3f308 0x8>,
> <0x3f410 0xc>;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
I am not getting this.
The line:
#include "bcm-nsp.dtsi"
can be found in:
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm988312hr.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625hr.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958622hr.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958625k.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958522er.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525er.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958623hr.dts
arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm958525xmc.dts
The pattern for the other DTS files that include this seems to be to
overwrite the compatible locally in bcm958522er.dts, like this:
&srab {
compatible = "brcm,bcm58522-srab", "brcm,nsp-srab";
};
Is there a reason why you are choosing to put an SoC specific compatible
in the common bcm-nsp.dtsi?
