Hi Sakari
On 11/6/20 12:53 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 10:26:37AM +0100, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
Hi Huges
On 11/4/20 6:32 PM, Hugues Fruchet wrote:
Add support of BT656 embedded synchronization bus.
This mode allows to save hardware synchro lines hsync & vsync
by replacing them with synchro codes embedded in data stream.
Add "bus-type" property and make it required so that there is no
ambiguity between parallel mode (bus-type=5) and BT656 mode (bus-type=6).
===========
= history =
===========
version 5:
- Add revisited bindings and devicetree with explicit use of "bus-type"
version 4:
- Fix typo in commit message
version 3:
- Fix bus_width print to %u as per Sakari comment
version 2:
- As per Sakari remark, revisit commit message and document
BT656 parallel bus mode in bindings
version 1:
- Initial submission
Hugues Fruchet (4):
media: stm32-dcmi: add support of BT656 bus
media: dt-bindings: media: st,stm32-dcmi: add support of BT656 bus
ARM: dts: stm32: set bus-type in DCMI endpoint for stm32mp157c-ev1
board
ARM: dts: stm32: set bus-type in DCMI endpoint for stm32429i-eval
board
.../devicetree/bindings/media/st,stm32-dcmi.yaml | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32429i-eval.dts | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp157c-ev1.dts | 1 +
drivers/media/platform/stm32/stm32-dcmi.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I'll take DT patches on stm32-next tree.
Just checking: that is only the two last patches in the set, or also the
binding patch?
Usually I let drivers/subsystem maintainer taking dt-bindings patches
with drivers patches.
(If binding changes come only with dts(i) patches I take them in my tree)
-->So yes I'll take only the last two patches.
Regards
alex
