Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] mfd: rt4505: Adds DT binding document for Richtek RT4831 MFD core

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年11月3日 週二 上午1:21寫道:
>
> On Mon, 02 Nov 2020 11:13:23 +0800, cy_huang wrote:
> > From: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Adds DT binding document for Richtek RT4831 MFD core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/richtek,rt4831.yaml    | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/dt-bindings/leds/rt4831-backlight.h        | 23 ++++++
> >  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/richtek,rt4831.yaml
> >  create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/leds/rt4831-backlight.h
> >
>
>
> My bot found errors running 'make dt_binding_check' on your patch:
>
> yamllint warnings/errors:
>
> dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
> Unknown file referenced: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/regulator/richtek,rt4831-regulator.yaml'
> xargs: dt-doc-validate: exited with status 255; aborting
> make[1]: *** [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile:59: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json] Error 124
> make: *** [Makefile:1364: dt_binding_check] Error 2
>
>
> See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1391911
>
> The base for the patch is generally the last rc1. Any dependencies
> should be noted.
>
> If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
> error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
> date:
>
> pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
>
> Please check and re-submit.
>
Sorry, I have one question.
If the richtek,rt4831.yaml is depend upon the other yaml, do I need to
merge it all into one patch?
Currently, my submitting order is mfd, backlight, and regulator.
Each part divided into two patches (one for source code, another for
dt_binding_document)
I have tried dt_binding_check. It cause the error like your bot said.
If dt_binding_check want to be pass, it means I should merge all dt
binding document into one patch due to the dependency.

If yes, I'll do it in next series patch.




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux