On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 12:33:41PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Maxime Ripard
> <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:52:49PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> The A23 has an almost identical PRCM clock tree. The difference in
> >> the APB0 clock is the smallest divisor is 1, instead of 2.
> >>
> >> This patch extends the sun6i-a31-apb0-clk driver to take divider
> >> tables associated to compatibles, and adds a compatible for the A23
> >> variant.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 +
> >> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> >> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> >> index af9e47d..e3a47ec 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> >> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Required properties:
> >> "allwinner,sun8i-a23-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A23
> >> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock
> >> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock on A31
> >> + "allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock on A23
> >> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A10
> >> "allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A13
> >> "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A10s
> >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c
> >> index 11f17c3..2197ac7 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c
> >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> >> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> >> #include <linux/module.h>
> >> #include <linux/of.h>
> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >>
> >> /*
> >> @@ -28,6 +29,21 @@ static const struct clk_div_table sun6i_a31_apb0_divs[] = {
>
> For reference:
>
> static const struct clk_div_table sun6i_a31_apb0_divs[] = {
> { .val = 0, .div = 2, },
> { .val = 1, .div = 2, },
> { .val = 2, .div = 4, },
> { .val = 3, .div = 8, },
> { /* sentinel */ },
> };
>
>
> >> { /* sentinel */ },
> >> };
> >>
> >> +/* The A23 APB0 clock has a standard power of 2 divisor */
> >
> > Why not just pass CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO then, instead of a table?
>
> The A31 APB0 clock uses a table for the odd /2 divisor for value 0.
> The standard table I'm using for the A23 is just to keep it simple
> and alike.
>
> >> +static const struct clk_div_table sun8i_a23_apb0_divs[] = {
> >> + { .val = 0, .div = 1, },
> >> + { .val = 1, .div = 2, },
> >> + { .val = 2, .div = 4, },
> >> + { .val = 3, .div = 8, },
> >> + { /* sentinel */ },
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +const struct of_device_id sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_dt_ids[] = {
> >> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_apb0_divs },
> >> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb0-clk", .data = &sun8i_a23_apb0_divs },
> >> + { /* sentinel */ }
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> static int sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> {
> >> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> >> @@ -36,12 +52,17 @@ static int sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> struct resource *r;
> >> void __iomem *reg;
> >> struct clk *clk;
> >> + const struct of_device_id *device;
> >>
> >> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> >> reg = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r);
> >> if (IS_ERR(reg))
> >> return PTR_ERR(reg);
> >>
> >> + device = of_match_device(sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_dt_ids, &pdev->dev);
> >> + if (!device)
> >> + return -EINVAL;
> >> +
> >> clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0);
> >> if (!clk_parent)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> @@ -49,7 +70,7 @@ static int sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> of_property_read_string(np, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
> >>
> >> clk = clk_register_divider_table(&pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent,
> >> - 0, reg, 0, 2, 0, sun6i_a31_apb0_divs,
> >> + 0, reg, 0, 2, 0, device->data,
> >
> > I'm not sure that it will actually work for the A31, since it does
> > define some dividers anyway, and the divider table is !NULL, even
> > though there's actually no dividers defined.
>
> I'm not following. The A31 does have a table defined. It's just cut
> off in this patch. I asked Boris to add the table when he was working
> on the A31 PRCM clocks. See above.
Ah right. My bad.
If these two clocks are these different though, maybe it would just be
easier to add a new driver. These are trivial enough anyway.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
