On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 6:26 PM, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:52:49PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: >> The A23 has an almost identical PRCM clock tree. The difference in >> the APB0 clock is the smallest divisor is 1, instead of 2. >> >> This patch extends the sun6i-a31-apb0-clk driver to take divider >> tables associated to compatibles, and adds a compatible for the A23 >> variant. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 + >> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----- >> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt >> index af9e47d..e3a47ec 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt >> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ Required properties: >> "allwinner,sun8i-a23-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A23 >> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock >> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock on A31 >> + "allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb0-clk" - for the APB0 clock on A23 >> "allwinner,sun4i-a10-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A10 >> "allwinner,sun5i-a13-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A13 >> "allwinner,sun5i-a10s-apb0-gates-clk" - for the APB0 gates on A10s >> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c >> index 11f17c3..2197ac7 100644 >> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c >> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sun6i-apb0.c >> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ >> #include <linux/clk-provider.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/of.h> >> +#include <linux/of_device.h> >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> >> /* >> @@ -28,6 +29,21 @@ static const struct clk_div_table sun6i_a31_apb0_divs[] = { For reference: static const struct clk_div_table sun6i_a31_apb0_divs[] = { { .val = 0, .div = 2, }, { .val = 1, .div = 2, }, { .val = 2, .div = 4, }, { .val = 3, .div = 8, }, { /* sentinel */ }, }; >> { /* sentinel */ }, >> }; >> >> +/* The A23 APB0 clock has a standard power of 2 divisor */ > > Why not just pass CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO then, instead of a table? The A31 APB0 clock uses a table for the odd /2 divisor for value 0. The standard table I'm using for the A23 is just to keep it simple and alike. >> +static const struct clk_div_table sun8i_a23_apb0_divs[] = { >> + { .val = 0, .div = 1, }, >> + { .val = 1, .div = 2, }, >> + { .val = 2, .div = 4, }, >> + { .val = 3, .div = 8, }, >> + { /* sentinel */ }, >> +}; >> + >> +const struct of_device_id sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_dt_ids[] = { >> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun6i-a31-apb0-clk", .data = &sun6i_a31_apb0_divs }, >> + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a23-apb0-clk", .data = &sun8i_a23_apb0_divs }, >> + { /* sentinel */ } >> +}; >> + >> static int sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node; >> @@ -36,12 +52,17 @@ static int sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> struct resource *r; >> void __iomem *reg; >> struct clk *clk; >> + const struct of_device_id *device; >> >> r = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >> reg = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, r); >> if (IS_ERR(reg)) >> return PTR_ERR(reg); >> >> + device = of_match_device(sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_dt_ids, &pdev->dev); >> + if (!device) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> clk_parent = of_clk_get_parent_name(np, 0); >> if (!clk_parent) >> return -EINVAL; >> @@ -49,7 +70,7 @@ static int sun6i_a31_apb0_clk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> of_property_read_string(np, "clock-output-names", &clk_name); >> >> clk = clk_register_divider_table(&pdev->dev, clk_name, clk_parent, >> - 0, reg, 0, 2, 0, sun6i_a31_apb0_divs, >> + 0, reg, 0, 2, 0, device->data, > > I'm not sure that it will actually work for the A31, since it does > define some dividers anyway, and the divider table is !NULL, even > though there's actually no dividers defined. I'm not following. The A31 does have a table defined. It's just cut off in this patch. I asked Boris to add the table when he was working on the A31 PRCM clocks. See above. Cheers ChenYu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html