Hi Chanwoo, On 18.06.2014 04:21, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > This patchset fix wrong compatible string for Exynos3250 ADC. Exynos3250 SoC > need to control only special clock for ADC. Exynos SoC except for Exynos3250 > has not included special clock for ADC. The exynos ADC driver can control > special clock if compatible string is 'exynos3250-adc-v2'. > > Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi > index 6c1fb67..107dc44 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250.dtsi > @@ -414,10 +414,10 @@ > }; > > adc: adc@126C0000 { > - compatible = "samsung,exynos-adc-v3"; > + compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-adc-v2"; > reg = <0x126C0000 0x100>, <0x10020718 0x4>; > interrupts = <0 137 0>; > - clock-names = "adc", "sclk_tsadc"; > + clock-names = "adc", "sclk_adc"; So, is it "sclk_adc" or "sclk_tsadc"? The code uses the former, while the documentation mentions the latter. Please fix this. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html