Re: [PATCH 07/11] soc: imx: gpcv2: add support for optional resets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/30/20 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> On Mi, 2020-09-30 at 18:30 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 9/30/20 6:23 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>>> On Mi, 2020-09-30 at 18:15 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 9/30/20 5:50 PM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>>>>> Normally the reset for the devices inside the power domain is
>>>>> triggered automatically from the PGC in the power-up sequencing,
>>>>> however on i.MX8MM this doesn't work for the GPU power domains.
>>>>
>>>> One has to wonder whether the VPU power domain has similar hardware bug
>>>> on the MX8MM ?
>>>
>>> Nope the VPUs have separate reset bits in the BLK_CTL. So after
>>> powering up the VPUMIX domain one can assert/deassert reset to the
>>> individual VPU cores.
>>
>> Is there any documentation for the BLK_CTL on MX8MM ? I can't find any
>> in the official RM.
> 
> I'm still waiting on some info from NXP about this. It is not
> documented in the RM.

Yes, I know.

>> And also, the GPUs need to use SRC reset, does the BLK_CTL reset do the
>> same "degree" of reset to the VPU as the SRC reset does to the GPUs ?
> 
> At least that is what I'm assuming.
> 
> The fundamental issue with the GPU domain is that there is no BLK_CTL
> in the GPUMIX domain and the resets are hooked up to the shared SRC
> reset, instead of having GPU BLK_CTL level resets.

Yep.

I'll CC Abel, maybe there is still undocumented way to reset the GPUs on
the MX8MM separately too.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux