On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:22 AM Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Convert TI K3 Board/SoC bindings to DT schema format. > > Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@xxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt | 26 ---------------- > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > MAINTAINERS | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml This causes warnings in ti,omap-hwspinlock.yaml which also landed for 5.10: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.example.dt.yaml: /: compatible: ['ti,am654'] is not valid under any of the given schemas (Possible causes of the failure): /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.example.dt.yaml: /: compatible: ['ti,am654'] is too short /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.example.dt.yaml: /: compatible:0: 'ti,am654' is not one of ['ti,am654-evm'] /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.example.dt.yaml: /: compatible:0: 'ti,j721e' was expected /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/ti,omap-hwspinlock.example.dt.yaml: /: compatible:0: 'ti,j7200' was expected >From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-bindings/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/ti/k3.yaml Please fix. I'd suggest just removing part of the example. It's not relevant. Rob
