Hi, Thanks for you review. On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:27:25PM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote: > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Add documentation for the binding of Toshiba Visconti SoC's watchdog. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml | 49 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..721e38fa5a0f > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +# Copyright 2020 Toshiba Electronic Devices & Storage Corporation > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/watchdog/toshiba,visconti-wdt.yaml#" > > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#" > > + > > +title: Toshiba Visconti SoCs PIUWDT Watchdog timer > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +allOf: > > + - $ref: watchdog.yaml# > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + enum: > > + - toshiba,visconti-wdt > > + > > + reg: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > + clocks: > > + maxItems: 1 > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + - reg > > + - clocks > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + soc { > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > + > > + wdt_clk: wdt-clk { > > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > > + clock-frequency = <150000000>; > > + #clock-cells = <0>; > > + }; > > + > > + watchdog@28330000 { > > + compatible = "toshiba,visconti-wdt"; > > + reg = <0 0x28330000 0 0x1000>; > > + clocks = <&wdt_clk>; > > + }; > > I was going to suggest adding the "timeout-sec" property as described in > watchdog.yaml but both code and usage seems to suggest it is optional. > I see. I will add about timeout-sec property. > > + }; > > So, > > Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thanks! > Thanks. > Best regards, Nobuhiro