On 14:53-20200917, Peter Rosin wrote: [..] > I do not have a tree and dt-patches should normally not go *through* me. yep. > But I'd still like to see what's happening. > I did not realize this was going to cause a *lot* of churn in the dt > files. How bad can it be when the file is new in this cycle? And is it > worth it? But it seems you all see problems with the current naming and > in that case it must surely be better to fix it early? yes - I think I can figure it out. > > And if it's a lot, maybe it needs to be more than one patch? I get the > feeling this will need to be taken care of by someone other than me, > because I'm just the maintainer of a very small subsystem and I don't > normally have to deal with "big" issues involving several trees. I would > be a bottleneck. No a pain, I think I can help get it through, may be, I worry too much.. Lets see how the cleanup series looks like. Roger: I am not touching the j7200 series till we cleanup j721e as discussed in this thread. please use 5.9-rc1 as your baseline for cleanup. Once available, we can figure out how to get 5.10-rc1 staged items later. Window is narrowing rather soon, so appreciate a quick cleaup :). -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
