Re: [PATCH 1/1] of: properties of reserved-memory nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 10/09/2020 17:20, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
The reusable and the no-map property are mutually exclusive.
Clarify this in the documentation.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@xxxxxx>

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxx>

---
  .../devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt    | 3 +++
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
index bac4afa3b197..eb987203548f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt
@@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ reusable (optional) - empty property
        system can use that region to store volatile or cached data that
        can be otherwise regenerated or migrated elsewhere.

+A node must not carry both the no-map and the reusable property as these are
+logically contradictory.
+
  Linux implementation note:
  - If a "linux,cma-default" property is present, then Linux will use the
    region for the default pool of the contiguous memory allocator.
--
2.28.0




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux