On 19:53-20200907, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
[... I should have responded to the correct patch..]
> > Besides yaml and compatibility acks, there are a few ancillary
> > comments to fix up.. Kconfig -> I think we should either stay with
> > status quo and create a new config option per SoC OR rename the
> > config to be generic (using j7200 with j721e SoC config is not very
>
> Please suggest your preference here. I guess separate defconfig for J7200?
I was just scanning through remaining arm64 additions to see what others have
done. We seem to have two options here:
a) Just use ARCH_K3 and no specific SoC configs
b) Specific SoC configs
In both cases, use += instead of \ to incrementally add dtbs
We have been going with (b) so far, Tero: any specific preference here?
(a) has the aspect of simplicity and reduced dependencies.
(b) Allows downstream kernels to save just a little bit and focus purely
on SoC of interest.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
