On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:17:58AM +0530, Yash Shah wrote: > Add a driver to manage the Cadence DDR controller present on SiFive SoCs > At present the driver manages the EDAC feature of the DDR controller. > Additional features may be added to the driver in future to control > other aspects of the DDR controller. So if this is a generic(ish) Cadence IP block shouldn't it be named Cadence and made generic? Or is the frontend somehow SiFive specific?
