On 9/1/20 5:30 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Use clock@ naming for nodes following standard conventions of device > tree (section 2.2.2 Generic Names recommendation in [1]). > > [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/devicetree-specification/tree/v0.3 > > Suggested-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> Acked-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@xxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > index 336d09d6fec7..03e28fc256de 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi > @@ -327,12 +327,12 @@ > reg = <0x00000210 0x4>; > }; > > - serdes0_clk: serdes_clk@4080 { > + serdes0_clk: clock@4080 { > compatible = "syscon"; > reg = <0x00004080 0x4>; > }; > > - serdes1_clk: serdes_clk@4090 { > + serdes1_clk: clock@4090 { > compatible = "syscon"; > reg = <0x00004090 0x4>; > }; > Btw, there is also ehrpwm_tbclk alongside these nodes which is currently defined as a syscon, but is actually a clock. regards Suman
