On 01/09/2020 14:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 15:45, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 at 15:34, Guillaume Tucker >> <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Krzysztof, Russell, >>> >>> On 10/08/2020 13:22, Guillaume Tucker wrote: >>>> The L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN flag is set during the L2C enable >>>> sequence. There is no need to set it in the default register value, >>>> this was done before support for it was implemented in the code. It >>>> is not set in the hardware initial value either. >>>> >>>> Clean this up by removing this flag from the default l2c_aux_val, and >>>> add it to the l2c_aux_mask to print an alert message if it was already >>>> set before the kernel initialisation. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> Notes: >>>> v2: fix flag name L310_AUX_CTRL_NS_LOCKDOWN >>>> >>>> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 ++-- >>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> I believe this v2 series has addressed all previous comments and >>> you were waiting for the 5.9 merge window to end. The patches >>> all still apply cleanly on v5.9-rc3. Do you want me to resend >>> the series anyway or is there anything else needed at this point? >>> >>> Maybe one thing that wasn't completely clear in v1 was whether >>> patch 2/4 was the right approach. I've explained the reason >>> behind it but didn't get a final reply from Russell[1]. >> >> I am sorry, my bad. I already applied this one and 3/4 (dts). >> Apparently I forgot to reply with confirmation and Patchwork did not >> notify you for some reason. No problem, I see them in linux-next now. Thanks! >> Patch 2/4 does not look like one for me so I would need ack from >> Russell to take. Did you submit it to the ARM patches queue? I've CC-ed linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the whole series. Did you mean anything else by the ARM patches queue? >> Patch 4/4 will wait for v5.10-rc1 as it depends on 1/4 and it is DTS patch. > > Correct: Patch 4/4 will wait for v5.10 because it depends on the DTS patch. Sure, in fact patch 4/4 depends on the DTS one (3/4) and also on the l2c fix (2/4) as otherwise prefetch would actually not be enabled. So it sounds like both remaining ones 2/4 and 4/4 are actually now pending Russell's ack. Best wishes, Guillaume [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/46fa1159-fcd6-b528-b8e8-2fba048236b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/
