Hi Guido. > > In fact I did decided against it since i was told that missing dev_* and > > DRM_* logging shouldn't be done. So is that o.k. nowadays? > s/missing/mixing/ > > I often request that logging is consistent - so I recognize the > argument. > > For panel/* I have not made up my mind what I think is the best > approach. The DRM_DEV_* and DRM_* logging do not add much value. > So I have been tempted several times to convert all logging in > panel/ to dev_* and pr_* (when no struct device * is available). > That would also avoid that we mix up logging. > > We have drm_* logging - but they require a valid drm_device * which we > do not have in the the panel drivers. So they are ruled out here. > > Do you have any opinions/comments on this? I went ahead and dropped the DRM_ logging in drm/panel, you are copied on the patchset. Feedback on the patches would be nice. Sam
