Hi Chun-Kuang, On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 23:55 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote: > Hi, Neal: > > Neal Liu <neal.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年7月31日 週五 上午10:52寫道: > > > > Hi Chun-Kuang, > > > > On Fri, 2020-07-31 at 00:14 +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote: > > > Hi, Neal: > > > > > > Neal Liu <neal.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年7月29日 週三 下午4:29寫道: > > > > > > > > MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data > > > > protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected > > > > masters. > > > > The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for > > > > further analysis or countermeasures. > > > > > > > > Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and > > > > it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation > > > > information is printed in order to find the murderer. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > + > > > > +/* > > > > + * devapc_extract_vio_dbg - extract full violation information after doing > > > > + * shift mechanism. > > > > + */ > > > > +static void devapc_extract_vio_dbg(struct mtk_devapc_context *ctx) > > > > +{ > > > > + const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs; > > > > + struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info; > > > > + void __iomem *vio_dbg0_reg; > > > > + void __iomem *vio_dbg1_reg; > > > > + u32 dbg0; > > > > + > > > > + vio_dbg0_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg0; > > > > + vio_dbg1_reg = ctx->devapc_pd_base + ctx->offset->vio_dbg1; > > > > + > > > > + vio_dbgs = ctx->vio_dbgs; > > > > + vio_info = ctx->vio_info; > > > > + > > > > + /* Starts to extract violation information */ > > > > + dbg0 = readl(vio_dbg0_reg); > > > > + vio_info->vio_addr = readl(vio_dbg1_reg); > > > > + > > > > + vio_info->master_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->mstid.mask) >> > > > > + vio_dbgs->mstid.start; > > > > + vio_info->domain_id = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->dmnid.mask) >> > > > > + vio_dbgs->dmnid.start; > > > > + vio_info->write = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_w.mask) >> > > > > + vio_dbgs->vio_w.start) == 1; > > > > + vio_info->read = ((dbg0 & vio_dbgs->vio_r.mask) >> > > > > + vio_dbgs->vio_r.start) == 1; > > > > + vio_info->vio_addr_high = (dbg0 & vio_dbgs->addr_h.mask) >> > > > > + vio_dbgs->addr_h.start; > > > > > > > > > I would like to define the type of ctx->vio_info to be > > > > > > struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs { > > > u32 mstid:16; > > > u32 dmnid:6; > > > u32 vio_w:1; > > > u32 vio_r:1; > > > u32 addr_h:4; > > > u32 resv:4; > > > }; > > > > > > so the code would like the simple way > > > > > > ctx->vio_info = (struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs)readl(vio_dbg1_reg); > > > > > > > This idea looks great! Is there any possible to pass the bit layout by > > DT data, and still make this operation simple? > > Why am I asking this question is because this bit layout is platform > > dependent. > > I doubt these info would be in a single 32-bits register for all > future SoC. If they are not in single 32-bits register, you may create > a vio_dbgs_type in DT data, and the code may be > > if (ctx->vio_dbgs_type == VIO_DBGS_TYPE_MTxxxx) { > ctx->vio_info = (struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs)readl(vio_dbg1_reg); > } else if (ctx->vio_dbgs_type == VIO_DBGS_TYPE_MTyyyy) { > ctx->vio_info->mstid = readl(vio_mstid_reg); > ctx->vio_info->dmnid = readl(vio_dmnid_reg); > ctx->vio_info->vio_w = readl(vio_vio_w_reg); > ctx->vio_info->vio_r = readl(vio_vio_r_reg); > } > > I think we need not to consider how the future would be. Once the > second SoC driver is upstreaming, we could find out the best solution > for it. > Okay, I'll apply this on next patch. Thanks ! > Regards, > Chun-Kuang. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Chun-Kuang. > > > > > > > + > > > > + devapc_vio_info_print(ctx); > > > > +} > > > > + > >