Hi, Neal:
This patch is for "mediatek,mt6779-devapc", so I think commit title
should show the SoC ID.
Neal Liu <neal.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2020年7月29日 週三 下午4:29寫道：
>
> MediaTek bus fabric provides TrustZone security support and data
> protection to prevent slaves from being accessed by unexpected
> masters.
> The security violation is logged and sent to the processor for
> further analysis or countermeasures.
>
> Any occurrence of security violation would raise an interrupt, and
> it will be handled by mtk-devapc driver. The violation
> information is printed in order to find the murderer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neal Liu <neal.liu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
[snip]
> +
> +struct mtk_devapc_context {
> + struct device *dev;
> + u32 vio_idx_num;
> + void __iomem *devapc_pd_base;
> + struct mtk_devapc_vio_info *vio_info;
> + const struct mtk_devapc_pd_offset *offset;
> + const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs;
> +};
I think this structure should separate the constant part. The constant part is:
struct mtk_devapc_data {
const u32 vio_idx_num;
const struct mtk_devapc_pd_offset *offset; /* I would like to
remove struct mtk_devapc_pd_offset and directly put its member into
this structure */
const struct mtk_devapc_vio_dbgs *vio_dbgs; /* This may disappear */
};
And the context is:
struct mtk_devapc_context {
struct device *dev;
void __iomem *devapc_pd_base;
const struct mtk_devapc_data *data;
};
So when you define this, you would not waste memory to store non-constant data.
static const struct mtk_devapc_data devapc_mt6779 = {
.vio_idx_num = 510,
.offset = &mt6779_pd_offset,
.vio_dbgs = &mt6779_vio_dbgs,
};
Regards,
Chun-Kuang.
> +
> +#endif /* __MTK_DEVAPC_H__ */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
