Hi Arnd, On Wed, 29 Jul 2020 at 21:14, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Does calling it "mstar,pmsleepv7" make more sense? I'm not sure what > > to call it really. > > Use the name of the oldest chip you know that supports it in there, > such as "mstar,msc313-pmsleep" if this one is specific to msc313. That makes sense. I think the original patch got merged to soc/arm/newsoc. Should I recreate the series or create a new patch to do the corrections? Slightly off topic but I'm working on the series for the interrupt controller and I've just renamed it from mstar,msc313e-intc to mstar,v7intc. I originally called it msc313e because I only knew of that chip but the same controller is present at the same place in all of the chips so far. I guess I should probably rename it to mstar,msc313-intc to keep with the first chip it appeared in pattern? Thanks, Daniel
