Hello Martin, On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:29:19AM +0200, Martin Botka wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote: > >> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See > >> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next. > >> > >> Amazing. But isn't there the same issue with it as this one where this > >> would fail to build on 32 bit architecture? > > > > In theory all these cases are coped for. I didn't see any problems yet, > > so I still assume also the 32 bit archs are fine. > > OK then all is fine. I will drop the patch in V2. > > Also Uwe i just realized that you sent the original message and also > this reply only to me and not to anyone else. > Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ? I hit "reply-to-all" and the mail only was sent to you because you wrote to only me. Also threading is somehow strange because your reply to my mail (with Message-Id: 20200727070411.ovkuwm76vuw3heo7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ) has In-Reply-To: <CADQ2G_HkiAZx8OhfQ_jeizveMaB-QN9dfN6Tcwfk9XuF97rmOg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> . So I assume all the strange things happened on your side until proved otherwise. :-) Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
