Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length

Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length
From: Martin Botka <martin.botka1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:32:31 +0200
Cc: Fenglin Wu <fenglinw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@xxxxxxxxx>, Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, devicetree <devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CADQ2G_HYTE6cd=PM2JzCTadkPe2DDb8dxObPdPJtz1626ktE9Q@mail.gmail.com>

> Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ?

Next time of course.

References:
- [PATCH RFC 0/6] Add QCOM pwm-lpg and tri-led drivers
  - From: Martin Botka
- [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length
  - From: Martin Botka
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length
  - From: Andy Shevchenko
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length
  - From: Martin Botka
- Re: [PATCH RFC 2/6] pwm: core: Add option to config PWM duty/period with u64 data length
  - From: Martin Botka