Hi Uwe,
Thank you for the feedback, will work on the changes for V3.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pwm-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-pwm-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Uwe Kleine-König
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 5:14 PM
> To: G Jaya Kumaran, Vineetha <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> pwm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Wan Mohamad, Wan
> Ahmad Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@xxxxxxxxx>; Shevchenko,
> Andriy <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pwm: Add PWM driver for Intel Keem Bay
>
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:47:07PM +0800,
> vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: "Lai, Poey Seng" <poey.seng.lai@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Enable PWM support for the Intel Keem Bay SoC.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lai, Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran
> > <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 9 ++
> > drivers/pwm/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c | 239
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig index
> > cb8d739..2b0419b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
> > @@ -569,4 +569,13 @@ config PWM_ZX
> > To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > will be called pwm-zx.
> >
> > +config PWM_KEEMBAY
> > + tristate "Intel Keem Bay PWM driver"
> > + depends on ARM64 || COMPILE_TEST
> > + help
> > + The platform driver for Intel Keem Bay PWM controller.
> > +
> > + To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
> > + will be called pwm-keembay.
> > +
> > endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Makefile b/drivers/pwm/Makefile index
> > a59c710..0c84ff2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/Makefile
> > @@ -55,3 +55,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL) += pwm-twl.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_TWL_LED) += pwm-twl-led.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_VT8500) += pwm-vt8500.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_ZX) += pwm-zx.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PWM_KEEMBAY) += pwm-keembay.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> new
> > file mode 100644 index 00000000..fa5fe95
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-keembay.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Intel Keem Bay PWM driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020 Intel Corporation
> > + * Authors: Lai Poey Seng <poey.seng.lai@xxxxxxxxx>
> > + * Vineetha G. Jaya Kumaran <vineetha.g.jaya.kumaran@xxxxxxxxx>
> > + */
>
> If possible, please add a link here to documentation for this chip.
>
There is no documentation released publicly (yet), but once there is, I will add it in.
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > +
> > +#define KMB_TOTAL_PWM_CHANNELS 6
> > +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX 65535
>
> If you write this as hexadecimal constant it is more obvious.
>
> > +#define KMB_PWM_EN_BIT BIT(31)
> > +
> > +/* Mask */
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
> > +#define KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK GENMASK(31, 0)
> > +
> > +/* PWM Register offset */
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET 0x00
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN1_OFFSET 0x04
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN2_OFFSET 0x08
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN3_OFFSET 0x0c
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN4_OFFSET 0x10
> > +#define KMB_PWM_LEADIN5_OFFSET 0x14
>
> All but ..LEADIN0.. are unused. Is this maybe more useful to write as:
>
> #define KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET(ch) (0x00 + 4 * (ch))
>
> ?
>
Agreed, will change this for both KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW_OFFSET and KMB_PWM_LEADIN_OFFSET.
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET 0x20
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW1_OFFSET 0x24
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW2_OFFSET 0x28
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW3_OFFSET 0x2c
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW4_OFFSET 0x30
> > +#define KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW5_OFFSET 0x34
>
> ditto.
>
> > +struct keembay_pwm {
> > + struct pwm_chip chip;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct clk *clk;
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static inline struct keembay_pwm *to_keembay_pwm_dev(struct
> pwm_chip
> > +*chip) {
> > + return container_of(chip, struct keembay_pwm, chip); }
> > +
> > +static inline void keembay_pwm_update_bits(struct keembay_pwm
> *priv, u32 mask,
> > + u32 val, u32 reg, int ch)
> > +{
> > + u32 buff, offset, tmp;
> > + void __iomem *address;
> > +
> > + offset = reg + ch * 4;
> > + address = priv->base + offset;
> > + buff = readl(address);
> > + tmp = buff & ~mask;
> > + tmp |= FIELD_PREP(mask, val);
> > + writel(tmp, address);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pwm_enable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) {
> > + keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 1,
> > + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pwm_disable(struct keembay_pwm *priv, int ch) {
> > + keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_EN_BIT, 0,
> > + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET, ch);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void keembay_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> pwm_device *pwm,
> > + struct pwm_state *state)
> > +{
> > + struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> > + unsigned long long pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> > + unsigned long clk_rate;
> > + u32 buff;
> > +
> > + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> > +
> > + /* Read channel enabled status */
> > + buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_LEADIN0_OFFSET + pwm-
> >hwpwm * 4);
> > + if (buff & KMB_PWM_EN_BIT)
> > + state->enabled = true;
> > + else
> > + state->enabled = false;
> > +
> > + /* Read period and duty cycle*/
>
> Missing ' ' before closing */
>
> > + buff = readl(priv->base + KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET + pwm-
> >hwpwm * 4);
> > + pwm_l_count = (buff & KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK) * NSEC_PER_SEC;
> > + pwm_h_count = ((buff & KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK) >> 16) *
> NSEC_PER_SEC;
>
> pwm_h_count = FIELD_GET(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, buff) *
> NSEC_PER_SEC
>
> > + state->duty_cycle = pwm_h_count / clk_rate;
> > + state->period = (pwm_h_count + pwm_l_count) / clk_rate;
>
> Please round up both values.
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int keembay_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct
> pwm_device *pwm,
> > + const struct pwm_state *state) {
> > + struct keembay_pwm *priv = to_keembay_pwm_dev(chip);
> > + struct pwm_state current_state;
> > + u16 pwm_h_count, pwm_l_count;
> > + unsigned long long div;
> > + unsigned long clk_rate;
> > + u32 pwm_count = 0;
> > +
> > + pwm_get_state(pwm, ¤t_state);
>
> Please check the hardware state, not the value cached in the PWM
> framework.
>
> > + if (!state->enabled && current_state.enabled) {
> > + keembay_pwm_disable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (state->polarity != PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL)
> > + return -ENOSYS;
>
> This must be checked before .enabled. That's because the expectation on
>
> .enabled = false
> .polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED
>
> is that the output gets constant high.
>
> > + /*
> > + * The upper 16 bits of the KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET register
> contain
> > + * the high time of the waveform, while the last 16 bits contain
> > + * the low time of the waveform, in terms of clock cycles.
>
> Just to be sure: Each period starts with the high time, right?
>
Yes, each period starts with the high time.
> > + * high time = clock rate * duty cycle / NSEC_PER_SEC
> > + * low time = clock rate * (period - duty cycle) / NSEC_PER_SEC
> > + *
> > + * e.g. For period 50000ns, duty cycle 30000ns, and clock rate 500MHz:
> > + * high time = (500000000 * 30000) / 1000000000 = 0x3A98
> > + * low time = (500000000 * 20000) / 1000000000 = 0x2710
> > + * Value written to KMB_PWM_HIGHLOWx_OFFSET = 0x3A982710
>
> For period = 50000ns, duty_cycle = 30000ns and clock rate 266666666 Hz you
> have to configure:
>
> high = 7999
> low = 5334
>
> > + */
> > +
> > + clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->clk);
> > +
> > + /* Configure waveform high time */
> > + div = clk_rate * state->duty_cycle;
> > + do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>
> Can this overflow?
>
> > + if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> > + return -ERANGE;
> > +
> > + pwm_h_count = (u16)div;
>
> No need for this cast.
>
> > + /* Configure waveform low time */
> > + div = clk_rate * (state->period - state->duty_cycle);
> > + do_div(div, NSEC_PER_SEC);
>
> Here the rounding is wrong. (See above example, currently you use low =
> 5333 here)
>
> > + if (div > KMB_PWM_COUNT_MAX)
> > + return -ERANGE;
> > +
> > + pwm_l_count = (u16)div;
> > +
> > + pwm_count |= pwm_h_count << 16;
> > + pwm_count |= pwm_l_count;
>
> pwm_count = FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_HIGH_MASK, pwm_h_count) |
> FIELD_PREP(KMB_PWM_LOW_MASK, pwm_l_count);
>
> > +
> > + keembay_pwm_update_bits(priv, KMB_PWM_COUNT_MASK,
> > + pwm_count,
> KMB_PWM_HIGHLOW0_OFFSET, pwm->hwpwm);
>
> here the rwm-procedure is not necessary as all 32 bits are written anyhow.
>
> > + if (state->enabled && !current_state.enabled)
> > + keembay_pwm_enable(priv, pwm->hwpwm);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > [...]
> > +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:keembay");
>
> This has to match your driver's name, so use:
>
> MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pwm-keembay");
>
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Keem Bay PWM driver");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL
> > +v2");
>
> In v1 you told that on reconfiguration the hardware completes the currently
> running period. Please document this in the driver, similar to e.g. pwm-
> sifive.c.
>
OK, I will refer to that example and add this information in.
> You only ever write the enable bit in the leadin register. If there is something
> != 0 at boot this influences the correct behaviour of the driver, right?
>
That's right, I will add a check during probe to ensure the bit is set to 0 as default.
> Further things to note there:
>
> - What is the behaviour on disable (usual candidates: freezes at
> current value, completes period and emits low, changes to High-Z)?
>
For this case, the period does not get completed.
As soon as the channel is disabled, the output goes low.
> - Can it do 0% and 100% duty ratio?
>
Yes, we can set duty cycles of 0% and 100%.
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
