Re: [PATCH v2] of: handle NULL node in next_child iterators

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 28 May 2014 10:39:02 -0700, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add an early check for the node argument in __of_get_next_child and
> of_get_next_available_child() to avoid dereferencing a NULL node pointer
> a few lines after.
> 
> CC: Daniel Mack <zonque@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

g

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - also fix __of_get_next_child against NULL node argument
> 
>  drivers/of/base.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
> index e67b308819c9..567e6e1b7921 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
> @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ static struct device_node *__of_get_next_child(const struct device_node *node,
>  {
>  	struct device_node *next;
>  
> +	if (!node)
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
>  	for (; next; next = next->sibling)
>  		if (of_node_get(next))
> @@ -746,6 +749,9 @@ struct device_node *of_get_next_available_child(const struct device_node *node,
>  	struct device_node *next;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
> +	if (!node)
> +		return NULL;
> +
>  	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&devtree_lock, flags);
>  	next = prev ? prev->sibling : node->child;
>  	for (; next; next = next->sibling) {
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux