On 25.06.20 16:47, Abel Vesa wrote: > On 20-06-25 08:57:52, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >> hi Leonard, >> >> On 24.06.20 08:08, Leonard Crestez wrote: >>> On 6/22/20 4:58 PM, Martin Kepplinger wrote: >>>> hi Leondard, >>>> >>>> before using this patchset I'd like to ask: Do you have plans to create >>>> an update and push this forward? It is useful. >>> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I am no longer with NXP and don't have access to imx hardware right now. >> >> I guess it'll get even harder to get the ATF part for devfreq >> implemented now :) Thanks for the update and all the best for your new >> stuff. >> >>> >>> However the series that you replied to is very old and was accepted many >>> months ago. You shouldn't have to apply out-of-tree kernel patches. >>> >> >> that particular series doesn't seem to be in mainline, see >> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Felixir.bootlin.com%2Flinux%2Flatest%2Fsource%2Fdrivers%2Fdevfreq%2Fimx8m-ddrc.c%23L283&data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7Cb00f437e756d4850238f08d818d51b59%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C637286650857331523&sdata=S7%2BN3%2BiTFkUW5YnmVzl36wEBlr%2BkTatGoDDrvY9XfTk%3D&reserved=0 >> or do I miss something? >> >> do you know who at nxp would be likely actively working on devfreq? > > Hi Martin, > > I will be working on this in the following weeks. > hi Abel, that's good to hear. I'm basically always happy to test changes to devfreq (the ondemand governor or an atf implementation). thanks, martin
