On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> I'm looking at 5.8-rc1.
>
> The only use of OF_MFD_CELL() where the same compatible is specified
> for multiple elements of a struct mfd_cell array is for compatible
> "stericsson,ab8500-pwm" in drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c:
>
> OF_MFD_CELL("ab8500-pwm",
> NULL, NULL, 0, 1, "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"),
> OF_MFD_CELL("ab8500-pwm",
> NULL, NULL, 0, 2, "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"),
> OF_MFD_CELL("ab8500-pwm",
> NULL, NULL, 0, 3, "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"),
>
> The only .dts or .dtsi files where I see compatible "stericsson,ab8500-pwm"
> are:
>
> arch/arm/boot/dts/ste-ab8500.dtsi
> arch/arm/boot/dts/ste-ab8505.dtsi
>
> These two .dtsi files only have a single node with this compatible.
> Chasing back to .dts and .dtsi files that include these two .dtsi
> files, I see no case where there are multiple nodes with this
> compatible.
>
> So it looks to me like there is no .dts in mainline that is providing
> the three "stericsson,ab8500-pwm" nodes that drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c
> is expecting. No case that there are multiple mfd child nodes where
> mfd_add_device() would assign the first of n child nodes with the
> same compatible to multiple devices.
>
> So it appears to me that drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c is currently broken.
> Am I missing something here?
>
> If I am correct, then either drivers/mfd/ab8500-core.c or
> ste-ab8500.dtsi and ste-ab8505.dtsi need to be fixed.
Your analysis is correct.
Although it's not "broken", it just works when it really shouldn't.
I will be fixing the 'ab8500-pwm' case in due course.
> Moving forward, your proposed OF_MFD_CELL_REG() method seems a good
> approach (I have not completely read the actual code in the patch yet
> though).
Thanks.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
