On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 04:52:44PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:13:47AM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > chained to this message is a second version of remaining patches from the > > first spin of the "DT: Improve validation for Marvell SoCs" [1] patch set. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200317093922.20785-1-lkundrak@xxxxx/ > > > > I've attempted to address the review of the v1, each patch includes a > > detailed change log. > > > > Compared to v1, wherever the license or maintainer information was > > missing, I've filled in GPL-2.0-only and people listed in MAINTAINERS > > file. As I've indicated in v1 cover letter, am not sure whether this is > > the optimal course of action. However I've included the relevant people > > in v1 Cc list and asked for clarifications, but didn't really get any > > feedback to that. > > Find someone that would care if the bindings are deleted. I'm fine > if you put yourself. Maybe subsystem maintainers are willing to take > orphans. I really only want my name on common things. Thanks for clarification & fixups to the patches. I'm wondering if Documentation/devicetree/writing-schema.rst could perhaps be made a bit clearer about how the maintainer key in a binding document is different from what is in the MAINTAINERS file. > Rob Lubo
