Hi Stephen,
I may have misunderstood what you meant (I did not notice that you have
taken other v10 patches, so I sent the entire v11 series by mistake), do
I need to resend the split bindings patches separately again?
Thanks and best regards!
在 2020/5/27 下午4:12, Stephen Boyd 写道:
Quoting 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) (2020-05-26 07:40:41)
Add the clock bindings for the X1830 Soc from Ingenic.
Signed-off-by: \u5468\u7430\u6770 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Notes:
v2->v3:
Adjust order from [3/5] in v2 to [4/5] in v3.
v3->v4:
Adjust order from [4/5] in v3 to [3/4] in v4.
v4->v5:
Rebase on top of kernel 5.6-rc1.
v5->v6:
Add missing part of X1830's CGU.
v6->v7:
No change.
v7->v8:
Rebase on top of linux-next.
v8->v9:
No change.
v9->v10:
Add missing "X1830_CLK_TCU".
.../devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml | 2 +
include/dt-bindings/clock/x1830-cgu.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/x1830-cgu.h
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml
This file is in Rob's DT tree staged for the next release, not in the
clk tree. Can you split this patch into two, one for the compatible
update and another for the header file update and send again? Then Rob
can pick up the yaml file change and I can pick up the header file
change.
index 0281cd1d7e1b..a952d5811823 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/ingenic,cgu.yaml
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ select:
- ingenic,jz4770-cgu
- ingenic,jz4780-cgu
- ingenic,x1000-cgu
+ - ingenic,x1830-cgu
required:
- compatible
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ properties:
- ingenic,jz4770-cgu
- ingenic,jz4780-cgu
- ingenic,x1000-cgu
+ - ingenic,x1830-cgu
- const: simple-mfd
minItems: 1