> Yes, I don't think anyone is saying otherwise. Correct. > > The problem is just that there are already .dtsi files for i.MX chips > having multiple ethernet interfaces > in the mainline kernel (at least imx6ui.dtsi, imx6sx.dts, imx7d.dtsi) Vybrid is one i use a lot with two FECs. > but that this patch series does not > modify those files to use the new DT format. > > It currently only modifies the dts files that are already supported by > hardcoded values in the driver. Exactly. This patch set itself adds nothing we don't already support. So the patch set as is, is pointless. > As to not knowing which instance it shouldn't matter. > The base dtsi can declare both/all ethernet interfaces with the > appropriate GPR bits. I fully agree. All it needs for this patchset to be merged is another patch which adds GPR properties to all SoC .dtsi files where appropriate, and optionally to a couple of reference designs which support WoL on their ports. Andrew
