On 07/05/2020 21:15, Faiz Abbas wrote:
According to the latest AM65x Data Manual[1], a different output tap delay value is optimum for a given speed mode. Update these values. [1] http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/am6526 Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@xxxxxx> --- v2: Rebased to the latest mainline kernel arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi index 11887c72f23a..6cd9701e4ead 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-main.dtsi @@ -244,7 +244,17 @@ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 136 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; mmc-ddr-1_8v; mmc-hs200-1_8v; - ti,otap-del-sel = <0x2>; + ti,otap-del-sel-legacy = <0x0>; + ti,otap-del-sel-mmc-hs = <0x0>; + ti,otap-del-sel-sd-hs = <0x0>; + ti,otap-del-sel-sdr12 = <0x0>; + ti,otap-del-sel-sdr25 = <0x0>; + ti,otap-del-sel-sdr50 = <0x8>; + ti,otap-del-sel-sdr104 = <0x5>;
Isn't this wrong? Doc claims the value for sdr104 should be 0x7? -Tero
+ ti,otap-del-sel-ddr50 = <0x5>; + ti,otap-del-sel-ddr52 = <0x5>; + ti,otap-del-sel-hs200 = <0x5>; + ti,otap-del-sel-hs400 = <0x0>; ti,trm-icp = <0x8>; dma-coherent; };
-- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
