On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 22 May 2014 14:33:17 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h> is already included by
>> r8a7779.dtsi.
>
> Isn't it better, like with C code, to explicitly include headers that provide
> the macros you need, instead of relying on implicit #include's that could
> change later ? OK, in this specific case, it's very unlikely that r8a7779.dtsi
> would stop including <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>, but in the
> general case I believe explicit includes to be good practice.
You're right. I was a bit overzealous.
Simon, please drop this.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
