On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:39:31 -0700
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > -void ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> > +bool ioasid_free(ioasid_t ioasid)
> > {
Sorry I missed this in the last reply.
I think free needs to be unconditional since there is not a good way to
fail it.
Also can we have more symmetric APIs, seems we don't have ioasid_put()
in this patchset.
How about?
ioasid_alloc()
ioasid_free(); //drop reference, mark inactive, but not reclaimed if
refcount is not zero.
ioasid_get() // returns err if the ioasid is marked inactive by
ioasid_free()
ioasid_put();// drop reference, reclaim if refcount is 0.
It is similar to get/put/alloc/free pids.
