Hi,
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:34:20PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:04:29 AM Antoine Ténart wrote:
> > +
> > +static struct phy_berlin_desc desc[] = {
> > + { .val = POWER_DOWN_PHY0 },
> > + { .val = POWER_DOWN_PHY1 },
>
> Only .val entry of struct phy_berlin_desc is initialized and needed,
> it seems that u32 vals[] should be used instead of desc[].
Sure.
> > +
> > +static int phy_berlin_sata_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct phy *phy;
> > + struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> > + struct phy_berlin_priv *priv;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!priv)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> > + priv->base = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res));
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
> > + return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
>
> devm_ioremap() (contrary to devm_ioremap_resource()) returns a valid
> pointer or NULL so return value checking should be fixed.
I'll fix this.
Thanks for the review!
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
