On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 04:22:43PM +0300, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:34:46PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:29:37PM +0300, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > > }, {
> > > > .compatible = "melfas,mms152",
> > > > .data = (void *)TYPE_MMS152,
> > > > + }, {
> > > > + .compatible = "melfas,mms345l",
> > > > + .data = (void *)TYPE_MMS345L,
> > > > },
> > >
> > > it's been some times I haven't been doing this, but is the order
> > > of the patches correct? shouldn't the binding be updated first?
> > >
> >
> > Yes. I had it correct in my original patch, but apparently swapped the
> > order accidentally for this one. I will do it correct again next time :)
>
> then with that change:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
Hi Dmitry,
I assume there is little reason to resend just to swap the order.
(You could just apply them in reverse order since they do not depend
on each other...)
But if there is something else I should change just let me know.
Thanks,
Stephan
