Hi Stephan,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:34:46PM +0200, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:29:37PM +0300, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > > }, {
> > > .compatible = "melfas,mms152",
> > > .data = (void *)TYPE_MMS152,
> > > + }, {
> > > + .compatible = "melfas,mms345l",
> > > + .data = (void *)TYPE_MMS345L,
> > > },
> >
> > it's been some times I haven't been doing this, but is the order
> > of the patches correct? shouldn't the binding be updated first?
> >
>
> Yes. I had it correct in my original patch, but apparently swapped the
> order accidentally for this one. I will do it correct again next time :)
then with that change:
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
Andi
