Am Samstag, 18. April 2020, 11:15:27 CEST schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi Justin, Heiko,
>
> In the discussion about "rockchip,px30-rga" it was mentioned that:
> "no status for soc internal components without any board-specifics".
> The binding is in mainline, but the dts node is missing I think.
> Should this also be changed?
yep, drop the status disabled from the dtsi and that then results
in not needing the board-level enablement
(background: rga is a simple mem2mem device without any
board-specific hooks)
>
> Johan
>
> +&rga {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
>
> > Add a node to define the presence of RGA, a 2D raster
> > graphic acceleration unit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> > index 340ed6ccb..29d50bebc 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> > @@ -621,6 +621,17 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > + rga: rga@20060000 {
> > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-rga", "rockchip,rk3288-rga";
> > + reg = <0x20060000 0x1000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RGA>, <&cru HCLK_RGA>, <&cru SCLK_RGA>;
> > + clock-names = "aclk", "hclk", "sclk";
> > + resets = <&cru SRST_RGA>, <&cru SRST_RGA_A>, <&cru SRST_RGA_H>;
> > + reset-names = "core", "axi", "ahb";
>
> > + status = "disabled";
>
> remove?
>
> > + };
> > +
> > iep_mmu: iommu@20070800 {
> > compatible = "rockchip,iommu";
> > reg = <0x20070800 0x100>;
>
>
