Hi Justin, Heiko,
In the discussion about "rockchip,px30-rga" it was mentioned that:
"no status for soc internal components without any board-specifics".
The binding is in mainline, but the dts node is missing I think.
Should this also be changed?
Johan
+&rga {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
> Add a node to define the presence of RGA, a 2D raster
> graphic acceleration unit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Swartz <justin.swartz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> index 340ed6ccb..29d50bebc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/rk322x.dtsi
> @@ -621,6 +621,17 @@
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + rga: rga@20060000 {
> + compatible = "rockchip,rk3228-rga", "rockchip,rk3288-rga";
> + reg = <0x20060000 0x1000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&cru ACLK_RGA>, <&cru HCLK_RGA>, <&cru SCLK_RGA>;
> + clock-names = "aclk", "hclk", "sclk";
> + resets = <&cru SRST_RGA>, <&cru SRST_RGA_A>, <&cru SRST_RGA_H>;
> + reset-names = "core", "axi", "ahb";
> + status = "disabled";
remove?
> + };
> +
> iep_mmu: iommu@20070800 {
> compatible = "rockchip,iommu";
> reg = <0x20070800 0x100>;
> --
> 2.11.0
