On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 at 18:43, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 4/15/2020 7:22 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 at 15:48, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On some qualcomm SoCs we need to vote on a performance state of a power > >> domain depending on the clock rates. Hence move to using OPP api to set > >> the clock rate and performance state specified in the OPP table. > >> On platforms without an OPP table, dev_pm_opp_set_rate() is eqvivalent to > >> clk_set_rate() > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Pradeep P V K <ppvk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Veerabhadrarao Badiganti <vbadigan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > This looks good to me! > > > > However, are there any of the other patches in the series that > > $subject patch depends on - or can I apply this as a standalone mmc > > patch? > > Hey Ulf, thanks for the review. I'll just need to respin these to make > sure I do not do a dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() if dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() > isn;t successful as discussed with Viresh on another thread [1] > > As for the dependencies, its only PATCH 01/21 in this series and that's > already been queued by Viresh [2] I see, thanks! Looks like Viresh is sending it to be included for v5.7-rc2, so I can pick your new version of $subject patch next week. [...] Kind regards Uffe
