On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:40:51PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Monday 19 May 2014 15:23:55 Will Deacon wrote: > > Fair enough -- I just don't think we should dress up an erratum workaround as > > a bug fix, especially when it's adding a new user of strongly-ordered memory > > to the kernel which we can't honour for arm64. > > Makes sense. How about a patch then that just changes the memory type for > the I/O space and adds a comment explaining all we found out? From what > I can tell, strict ordering is required for Armada 3xx, may or may not > be required elsewhere but should never hurt noticeably. We may want to restrict > it to ARMv6/v7 so we don't have to pick the right domain. Ok, and we don't bother with the extra dsb in outb? I'm alright with that if the comment goes into enough detail. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
