On 14/04/2020 13:05:03+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>> But this is very unlikely to happen because this would be limited to a
> >>> single board device tree instead of impact every sam9x60 based boards.
> >>
> >> Very unlikely but a having a patch with diff like this:
> >>
> >> +&gpbr {
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +&rtt {
> >> + atmel,rtt-rtc-time-reg = <&gpbr 0x0>;
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >>
> >> and reverting it may affect the other users of gpbr in sam9x60ek.dts.
> >>
> >
> > Again, this affects only sam9x60ek.dts instead of possibly multiple DTs
> > that may be out of tree. So the risk of doing that is null.
>
> Anyway... I'll merge it although I don't consider is the right way.
>
Do as you wish but a board DT change mixed with a dtsi is a no go.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
