Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: dts: sam9x60: add rtt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/04/2020 19:26:58+0300, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> Add RTT.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts | 5 +++++
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi       | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts
> index ab3d2d9a420a..4020e79a958e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sam9x60ek.dts
> @@ -617,6 +617,11 @@
>  	};
>  };
>  
> +&rtt {
> +	atmel,rtt-rtc-time-reg = <&gpbr 0x0>;
> +	status = "okay";

Is there any point using a gpbr register while there is already a much
better RTC in the system?

In any case, this diff should be merge with the other at91-sam9x60ek.dts
change instead of being with the dtsi change.

> +};
> +
>  &shutdown_controller {
>  	atmel,shdwc-debouncer = <976>;
>  	status = "okay";
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi
> index 326b39328b58..e1d8e3a4cb0b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9x60.dtsi
> @@ -661,6 +661,13 @@
>  				status = "disabled";
>  			};
>  
> +			rtt: rtt@fffffe20 {
> +				compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-rtt";
> +				reg = <0xfffffe20 0x20>;
> +				interrupts = <1 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 7>;
> +				clocks = <&clk32k 0>;
> +			};
> +
>  			pit: timer@fffffe40 {
>  				compatible = "atmel,at91sam9260-pit";
>  				reg = <0xfffffe40 0x10>;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux