Hi Prabhakar,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:42:39PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> PLL's on platforms might not be so accurate enough to generate the
> required clock frequency, so instead of erroring out on xvlck frequency
> mismatch just warn the user and continue ahead in probe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> index 52848fff8a08..314760349adf 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov5645.c
> @@ -1103,11 +1103,8 @@ static int ov5645_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> }
> /* external clock must be 24MHz, allow 1% tolerance */
> xclk_freq = clk_get_rate(ov5645->xclk);
> - if (xclk_freq < 23760000 || xclk_freq > 24240000) {
> - dev_err(dev, "external clock frequency %u is not supported\n",
> - xclk_freq);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (xclk_freq < 23760000 || xclk_freq > 24240000)
> + dev_warn(dev, "xvclk mismatched, modes are based on 24MHz\n");
>
> for (i = 0; i < OV5645_NUM_SUPPLIES; i++)
> ov5645->supplies[i].supply = ov5645_supply_name[i];
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
