On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 02:32:26PM +0200, Oleksandr Suvorov wrote: > Add the description of PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL flag. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Suvorov <oleksandr.suvorov@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt > index 084886bd721e..440c6b9a6a4e 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm.txt > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ period in nanoseconds. > Optionally, the pwm-specifier can encode a number of flags (defined in > <dt-bindings/pwm/pwm.h>) in a third cell: > - PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED: invert the PWM signal polarity > +- PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL: don't invert the PWM signal polarity This doesn't make sense. PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL is not part of the DT ABI. The third cell of the specifier is a bitmask of flags. PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL is an enumeration value that evaluates to 0, so it makes absolutely no sense as a flag. PWM signals are considered to be "normal" by default, so no flag is necessary to specify that. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature